on the continuing coverfail
Jan. 20th, 2010 12:40 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Yo. I keep seeing the excuse that well the publishers don't give the cover artists any info about the books protags. My question is...why not? They give the cover artists some small summary of what the story is about right? Some signpost so that they have an idea of what to shoot for? What is wrong with adding the fact of the protags race to those signpost? Is it going to take that much ink? Not specifying the race of the characters to the cover artist is a stupid, hurtful and rather easily correctable practice. Change it. Now.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-20 06:39 am (UTC)I always made a personal point to ask the authors for cover suggestions (a principal that, while fine in theory, I often lived to regret--people who are good with words are often TERRIBLE with visuals). While I and the author got nominal cover approval, the final say rested (with some justice) with marketing--the cover, like the index, is fundamentally a marketing tool.
What we need people to understand is that people POC on covers is good marketing.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-20 07:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-21 06:52 pm (UTC)CoverFail has made the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, one of the major sources of mainstream news in the Puget Sound area, so it looks like the issue is getting some recognition.
http://blog.seattlepi.com/bookpatrol/archives/191805.asp for the link, and apologies if you saw this before.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-21 07:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-01-21 08:01 pm (UTC)