unusualmusic_lj_archive: (Default)
So last month, Jesse McCartney withdrew from the Avatar cast and was replaced by Dev Patel, of Slumdog Millionaire fame.


[livejournal.com profile] aang_aint_whiteably points out the fuckery involved in that decision:

• Their choice of Patel specifically -- the only young, male, Asian actor currently in the public spotlight -- displays a "one size fits all" approach to casting. Patel is Indian, whereas Zuko's culture puts him much closer to Chinese. This is not unlike equating Britain with Italy, and has angered and insulted many of our supporters.

• Assuming the rest of the Fire Nation is cast in kind, we're now presented with a world in which a race of dark-skinned South Asians are the villains. While Prince Zuko is later redeemed, in this first film Zuko is still very much the "bad guy," who will be chasing and threatening three white heroes.



Naturally. Cause all Asians are interchangeable don'cha know, just like all blacks look alike!!!


To compound the insult, comes this new article in the Washington Post featuring the arrogant little prick of a casting director DeeDee Ricketts. And both article and Ms. Ricketts have managed to send my blood pressure into the stratosphere.


Lets start with this sentence:


"Smile!" calls the boy's father, who was born in Ulan Bator.

"No, he shouldn't smile," a casting assistant tells him. "They don't like people to smile because it's not how you really look."


*blink* *blink* What do you MEAN that's not how you usually look? Mongolian people don't smile? Mongolian warriors don't smile? What the hell is wrong with you people? How in the hell in 2009 do we still have to have to be dealing with this type of ignorance, bullshit and stereotyping? In the name of heaven and earth, get the hell off the "inscrutable Asian" BS already!!! But hey. Thats just one sentence. Maybe the rest of teh article will be good enough so that I can ignore that. After all, my blood pressure...


And then we get to our reporter pulling this choice bit of nonsense...
What do members of the Earth Kingdom look like? Like they're from Mongolia. Or Cambodia or Laos. Something like that. Exotically Asian, at least.

What the fuck is that about? Would it have KILLED yon reporter, to contact the creators of the series and found out precisely where the guys are supposed to be from? The demographics of Cambodia, Mongolia and Laos are NOT interchangeable, you proudly ignorant asshole! What did you do, pick up a map of Asia and grab countries at fucking random? To make matters worse, a look at the Wiki for the Earth kingdom points out that the culture is apparently based on Qing Dynasty China! (Which goes right back to the moviemakers and their shenanigans, but I can't even take that on cause when do Mongolians ever get to BE in movies?) I mean, seriously? And what is UP with this continual insistence that Asians are ohmigod exotic? As compared to what? You white people? Is it so hard for you all to do some research so that the mystery and unusualness gets cleared away? (And don' tell me that they are not native. Piles of white people are not native to America and never get tagged with the "exotic" appellation. To say nothing of the history of this country re: whites and American Indians.) So not only are the Mongolians Asian, which is considered mysteriously different enough, they are "exotically Asian". Jesus fuck. No wonder the little boy is not supposed to smile. All the stereotypes about Asians must apply to Mongolians with double the force now, after all.


But wait! There's more:"I think it's one of those things where I pull my hair up, shave the sides, and I definitely need a tan," Rathbone told MTV.com, presumably just before his publicist sat him down for a chat about political correctness. "It's one of those things where, hopefully, the audience will suspend disbelief a little bit." Ah, "political correctness". Such a nice trivializing word. Just the word for a reporter to use so as to get in a nice, snarky turn of phrase in her article. Cause see, the utter insult, teh offensiveness, the complete rage-inducing scale of this comment, can be so derailed, can be so nicely de-intensified, by sweeping it under the rug of "political correctness". The fact that the casting directors decided that Inuits are not god enough to play themselves, that only some white guy would do. And said white guy thinking that, oh well, its ONLY a matter of changing his hairstyle and getting a tan. I mean, can you see this? The complete erasure of the character? The total scale of the disrespect that these people have for the source material and the people in question that they are representing? Do they even think that Inuits are fucking human? At all? All that an Inuit is, history, culture, being, reduced to a hairstyle and a tan. And complaints about such cultural supremacy, such casual contempt, dismissed as political correctness. Snarkily. How fucking funny.

And then of course, we have got Ms.Ricketts:

"When you take a beloved story that has a fan base, you'll never be able to make everyone happy," says Ricketts, the casting director, who was not involved with the casting of principal roles. "There's been some talk that we're casting authentic Asians as a response to the backlash, which is totally wrong because our world is multi-ethnic and the 'Avatar' world will be multi-ethnic."



1. Authentic Asians. Authentic Asians. Dev Patel, perfectly good Indian actor, has been hired to play Prince Zuko. Whose Fire Nation:

The Fire Nation is located near the planet's equator in the western hemisphere and comprises an archipelago of volcanic islands, drawing its inspiration from countries like China, Iceland, and Indonesia, as well as the many volcanic Pacific islands.
...

While all the names of people and places in the Avatar series clearly have Chinese influence, the Fire Nation seems most similar to it. Women wear their hair in various updos, usually simple and elegant in style and noblewomen often sport long, sharp, well-manicured nails. Men have various hairstyles; those of importance and higher class wear a traditional bun or top-knot accompanied by a hairpiece. Fashion in the Fire Nation mimics traditional Chinese elements as well. Layers of various colors, coats, and traditional pieces of armor are common elements in their style, as in Chinese traditional clothing. Citizens and rulers of the Fire Nation wear colors ranging from black, to brown, to various reds, very often accented by gold lining or jewelry. Skin complexion is usually fair or pale, however sparingly ranges to tan and darker brown. Those from the Fire Nation have golden, amber or light gray-blue eyes.


Obviously all Asians are interchangeable after all. White people just have so much trouble telling them apart!!!


2. Yes, Avatar is multi ethnic. BUT THAT MULTI ETHNICITY DOES NOT INCLUDE WHITES. AT ALL. ANYWHERE. And it CANNOT include whites, because NONE OF THE CULTURES DEPICTED ARE WHITE CULTURES. ANYWHERE. But what you are doing, is sending the Asians, Inuits and the other ethnicities represented in the cartoon are NOT GOOD ENOUGH TO BE THE HEROES IN THEIR OWN FUCKING FILM. They can only be EVIL and ANONYMOUS EXTRAS. Your casting of white people e is predicated on the absurd, racist assumption that only white people can be heroes and good people, and POC can only be evil or the victims of other POC people whose asses need to be saved by white people. You are saying that only white people are good enough to tell stories, even if the story IS NOT ABOUT WHITE PEOPLE AT ALL. You are insulting, culturally appropriating, fuck it you are STEALING the cultures, and stories and bedecking yourselves in them, and negatively stereotyping the ACTUAL POC TO WHOM THESE BELONG. And you are fucking up the entire premise of the fucking series in the first place, while you are doing so.

[livejournal.com profile] bossymarmalade puts it even more bluntly:



I am not -- I would guess that most of the people protesting Avatar whitewashing are not -- primarily unhappy that they are ruining "a beloved story".

I am unhappy that they are DEMONIZING MY ETHNICITY. I am unhappy that they have cast white people in the heroic roles and Asians as the flavourful background. I am unhappy that the story is now about the peaceful white Air & Water Tribes who are the targets of genocide at the hands of the warlike brown Fire Nation.

That's the reason for unhappiness, DeeDee Ricketts. And you should know how much you've contributed to it, because every time you open your mouth you say something even more ignorant and hurtful. Every time the people behind this movie try to scramble to cover their tracks, they make it even *worse*. "Our world is multi-ethnic and the Avatar world will be multi-ethnic"? Yes, but apparently with the same silencing racism, the same use of Asian culture as set-dressing and Asian people as oddities, and the added bonus of making white people both martyred victim and brave, wise hero.



3. Look at this link again ladies and gentlemen.

Not content with changing all the heroes to white and thereby reinforcing the colonialist impression the POC are incapable of ruling themselves and must be ruled by white people...

Here is the BREAKING CASTING NEWS we found out:

We have figured out HOW they are casting this film and what M. Night means by diversity.

We talked to many of the actors auditioning inside and this is what they told them. The reason why they were hiring extras is NOT to throw Asians in the background. Well, it's mostly that, but there is an more evil plot behind it all.

They were looking for Earth Nation people. The casting director inside said that they are casting around the race of the actors they have chosen, so this is how the tribes will break down:

Water Tribe = White People

Fire Nation = Indian People

Earth Nation = "Asian" People

Which if rumors are correct, the final puzzle piece is:

Air Nation = White People



Oh. God. So now, two of the tribes needed to be whitefied? WHAT THE FUCK FOR? I mean, its established that Hollyowood has no goddamn ethics in properly telling stories and representing POC so it must be the money. They think that white people are the primary audience and wont go see a movie which has so much brown people in there and no whites. The horror! But the question I have to ask is... didn't the show get popular without the white people in there? So why is it that it would become necessarily unpopular in the age of anime, which is gobbled up by tons of whites and featured mostly nonwhite people therein? And seriously? Why the hell did you all pick up the story if you thought that an absence of white people would hurt your bottom line? Why couldn't you just LEAVE IT THE FUCK ALONE? Why in the HELL did you have be hellbent on destroying the damn thing entirely in pursuit of your racism and cash?


All I have to say is this. I will buy the original cartoon series. I will never, ever, EVER watch your abomination of a movie. Neither will any of my family. Or my friends. Fuck you people to hell.

Fuck it.

Feb. 20th, 2009 07:25 pm
unusualmusic_lj_archive: (Default)
Muslim Girl has had to suspend publication. Right wing furore = equal scared advertisers. I liked their perspective dammit! To say nothing of being able to open the fucking mag and really see a diverse group of young people represented therein. none of this white rules and maybe one asian or black girl to hold off the PC. And no articles on crushes or frigging boyfriends!!! Profiles on interestingly girls, and great articles! Hell yeah, I'm pissed!
unusualmusic_lj_archive: (Default)
Vanity Fair still believes that brown skin is ugly.

via:[livejournal.com profile] kali921

Vanity Fair Not Down With Brown

Freida [Pinto from Slumdog Millionaire] resplendent and au naturel:





Freida as she appears in Vanity Fair:


unusualmusic_lj_archive: (Default)
It got worse, since the last time that I made a comment about it. [livejournal.com profile] rydra_wong has the details if you want to see.


[livejournal.com profile] skywardprodigal's take is for me, one of the best insights about the whole affair.

I'm thinking that the current race fail in SFF reflects that neither technology nor progress could create a better world when one group of people aspire to and worship manifest destiny and American style imperialism without critiquing what it costs communities from which its default heroes are excluded.
unusualmusic_lj_archive: (Default)
See, I've been trying valiantly to ignore the current clusterfuck of doom that is once again enveloping teh LJ re: certain white authors' clumsy, ahistorical, racially promblematic and downright headdesk inducing handling of minorities and their legends in their sf/historical/ whatever the hell they might be writing about.

Naturally, as has happened in the majority of these cases, the author and her friends have rallied around in self defense. They are manning the barricades and are shooting missiles of condescension: "Oh, you are not smart enough to read the text properly!!!" "you need to have gone to university to be able to understand the writers intent!!!" (Really? For a fucking fantasy fiction novel????) or "oh well some people [that is, the critiquers] are not smart at all you know, lets just ignore their petty concerns". They have been unleashing truly astonishing bombs of self-pity, pique, and anger at the unmitigated GALL of these troublesome POC daring to ask that they be properly portrayed, "HOW DARE YOU CALL ME RACIST!!! TAKE THAT BACK!!!


There are those who are counseling surrender."Oh please don't upset us well-meaning white people, with your emotion, it is so unseemly and discomfiting." "Oh, how do you expect people to listen to you when you are so emotional! Your tone, your tone!!!" There are those who are screaming huffily, "Well, if we are doing it wrong, YOU need to tell us what to do!!!" (Never mind the fact that various articles have been written and re-written about this same goddamn problem over the two years that I have been on LJ and in any case, when links are proffered, refusal to read and engage constructively is rampant, and all we have is a bunch of white people acting the outraged, racist fools on various people's journals. And, of course, there is the inevitable push to portray the victims of their stereotypes, aggression, racism and downright ignorant attitudes as the actual problems. So the people who are pointing out that the toxic effects of their literary pollution is having a dire effect on POC readers mental health, well, they are abusers. reverse racists. whiners. these angry poc hordes are attacking the white people who were doing them a favour by even mentioning them in their precious writing oh my god how ungrateful, the bitches and trolls!!!!!!!!!

I cannot believe that every fucking couple of months the same fucking bullshit pops up again and again and no-one seems to be learning from it. Minorities still portrayed as sub-human and/or in thrall to white protagonists. Minorities still barbarians, whites civilized saviours. Minority cultures evil, whites' teh greatest thing since sliced bread. Minority cultures distorted and mangled so as to heighten the "exotic" quotient of the story, carefully set out medieval halls and forests populated with white magical beings ... And of course, when there is a minority hero, if he/she isn't over sexual and/or barbaric, she/he is practically a white person in blackface. Thinks white, acts white and must be separated from those barbaric uncivilized other. I am so fucking sick and tired of this shit that I could fucking puke. And you know what is completely spirit draining? The fact that in the next couple months, the same motherfucking shit will happen all over a-fucking-gain. A post-racial society my ass! I am just at the point where my patience for this shit is gone.
unusualmusic_lj_archive: (Default)
ROUNDUP ONE


ROUNDUP TWO

Some of the entries that hit the spot for me.


UNICORNS, or a list of Asian, First Nation and seasoned with 1 or 2 White actors who could have been used to play the Avatar characters

Fear of a Black Fantasy Planet

[livejournal.com profile] ojouchan was particularly upset yesterday. She's worried about our children, who will be brown, and who will look to the few characters who look like them, then wonder why they get changed to look like the people who don't. She's worried about her niece, who recently told her momma, "My favorite color is going to be brown, because that's what color my skin is, and nobody likes it." She's only four. I'm worried too, but it's still not as real for me yet.

But that's why I find it utterly heartwrenching that M. Night Shyamalan, who decided or at the very least signed off on the idea that all of these beautiful characters of color are better off being all-white, was initially drawn to the project because his Indian-American daughters loved the show so much they wanted to dress up as Katara.


Angry Asian Man: A break-up, of sorts.

What does this casting choice say to me, the angry Asian man? It says that every time somebody speaks more slowly and loudly to me because they assume that English isn't my first tongue, they're right to do so, because I'm not normal. It says that when my freshman year roommate thought that the delivery guy calling with my order was my dad, I shouldn't have been offended, because the guy sounded Chinese on the phone, so how was he supposed to know, right?



Debunking the Arguments and what else you can do

But so-and-so character has pale skin, big eyes and light eyes! Those are Caucasian features! Therefore he could be white!
FACT ONE: Not all Asians have dark skin
FACT TWO: Not all Asians have small ickle tiny eyes
FACT THREE: Not all Asians have dark eyes
FACT FOUR: Many Asian children have giant melon eyes. BECAUSE THEY'RE CHILDREN.
FACT FIVE: Asian people have many many differing facial features too! Just like Caucasian facial features! Zowie! Zoinks! Zounds!

They are all dressed in blatantly Asian-style clothes and follow many Asian-influenced precepts. I don't know how many times I can say this. So just once, just this once just accept the possibility that a kid dressed in Tibetan monks clothing who subscribes to a Buddhist-type religion should therefore be Asian. Yes, pale skin, big eyes and all.


DO something about it!

I love Avatar, and have for a long time. But I'm pretty disappointed about this casting decision, and I know I'm not alone in that. This post is about what we can do.

Petitions are largely pointless. Emails are easily ignored. What we need to do is send real, paper letters to Paramount Pictures -- specifically, the two produces, Kathleen Kennedy and Frank Marshall -- telling them why we're offended by their casting choices and what we want them to do about it.

Below is a guide for how to make your letter as effective as possible and where to send it once you're done.MORE


EDIT:RACEFAIL BINGO CARDS!!!


HERE and HERE
unusualmusic_lj_archive: (Default)
Introducing the cast of Avatar: The Last Air Bender!!!




Katara, as played by (non-Asian) Nicola Peltz

Katara, as played by (non-Asian) Nicola Peltz

Zuko, as played by (non-Asian) Jesse McCartney

Zuko, as played by (non-Asian) Jesse McCartney

Sokka, as played by (non-Asian) Jackson Rathbone

Sokka, as played by (non-Asian) Jackson Rathbone



I don't even want to talk about this shit. Nojojojo has a nice, reasonable, non-expletive featuring post on the matter I just want to kill people. And use expletives. And while we are at it? Is it so goddamn hard for them to find actual fucking actors for films these days? Jesse fucking McCartney? WTF????


EDIT: And this shit? Is happening with an ASIAN DIRECTOR! What, are we dealing with a quota of diversity here? Since the director is M. Night Shyamalan, the quota of non-whites have been successfully filled, so on with the show? Has he LOST HIS MIND? HAS EVERYONE LOST THEIR MINDS?
unusualmusic_lj_archive: (Default)
Via: Shakesville

JC Penny doesn't "do" black hair


Brenda McElmore went to JC Penny's to get her hair dyed black and was denied service.

According to KTLA, McElmore was told, "We don't do African-American hair." She was then directed to elsewhere for hairstyling needs. For McELmore it triggered a time of growing up under Jim Crow laws, wherein blacks were routinely denied services based on the colour of our skin. She has since filed suit against JC Penny. The company responded by sending the following letter.
"Let me apologize again for the customer service experience you had in our store. As we discussed, our salon receptionist felt that we did not have the technical proficiency... to perform the service you required. She may not however have expressed this to you in a way that was not offensive. For this I again apologize. Because customer service is ... so important to our company, we would rather not attempt the service if we cannot perform it as required."
Isn't that beautiful lawyer speak for your hair is too nappy and untamable to deal with. The woman wasn't asking for a hair treatment, or a hair style that was specifically Afrocentric, she was asking for a damn dye job. If the salon does not have someone there that can colour hair, then they are not a hair salon.
You know on second thought, even if she was asking for a perm, corn rows, or a weave, why should she not have been able to walk into a hair salon and expect them to be able to cater to her needs. Hair care is one of the few industries that continues to be divided by race. One look at the magazines in the waiting area will let you know if you are in the right place or not.

This continues largely because black hair is deemed to difficult to deal with. Somehow the white hairdressers cannot be proficiently trained to deal with the high maintenance needs of a black woman....oh no their delicate hands can only deal with the silky locks of white people. In all of the years I have been going to salons, I have only ever been to one that catered to both white and black women alike. The segregation is so normalized that black hair care even has its own aisle at Walmart and Shoppers Drug mart.
MORE
unusualmusic_lj_archive: (Default)
The creeping creepiness of racism

Well, my friends, I believe that we are being systematically de-sensitized to these issues by the MSM.

De-sensitization isn't difficult. All you have to do is get someone to accept something as trivial ("It was just a joke") and the next thing you introduce (slightly more overt, slightly more offensive) can also be touted as something trivial. If it's too much, too soon, you can back off a bit, maybe look contrite, put someone on a leave of absence for a few months, and then bring them back and try again.

Think torture. Think Habeus Corpus. Think invading Iran.

One of the distinct advantages of getting older is that I can remember more than two decades.

I remember that Howard Cosell once said: "Look at that little monkey go!" (in reference to a black athlete - 1983) -- and was out a job that year, even though there was some argument about whether this was a term he used for athletes of all colors (yeah, right). I remember that Jimmy the Greek was fired from CBS in 1988 for his racist comments about black athletes. Not sanctioned. Not given a leave of absence. Fired.

Let's compare some statements, shall we?
"The black is a better athlete to begin with because he's been bred to be that way -- because of his high thighs and big thighs that goes up into his back, and they can jump higher and run faster because of their bigger thighs. This goes back all the way to the Civil War when during the slave trading, the owner -- the slave owner would breed his big black to his big woman so that he could have a big black kid." - Jimmy the Greek, 1988

". . . these people have shown a remarkable ability, ladies and gentlemen, to cross borders, boundaries -- they get anywhere they want to go. They can do it without water for a long time. They don't get apprehended, and they will do things other people won't do." - Rush Limbaugh on Hispanic competitors on Survivors, 8/23/06
See any differences? Oh -- maybe the social outrage and the firing. Just that.

In my mind, Jimmy the Greek and Rush Limbaugh are perfectly comparable. They aren't front-line news-anchors, but they're both big, bombastic personalities with major media presence.

My problem with filing off the edges of our outrage at such racist words and actions is just that -- it's filing off -- it's erosive -- and the problem with erosion is that if you let it go on long enough, you'll eventually wind up with nothing at all.

MORE
unusualmusic_lj_archive: (Default)
Racialicious looks at the Samurai Girl Miniseries on ABC

Based on a series of popular young adult novels, the show stars Jamie Chung as a 19-year-old Japanese girl named Heaven who discovers that the wealthy businessman who adopted her as an infant is really the head of the Yakuza(!) and responsible for murdering her beloved brother. She breaks from her family and begins training to become a samurai, and with the help of a group of new American friends, sets out to take down her father’s evil empire.


Naturally, since its a good guess that the books were written by mostly whites


The book series was developed by editors at Alloy Entertainment, which also produced "Gossip Girl." After the initial idea was passed around after an in-house brainstorming meeting about seven years ago, they assigned a group of writers to complete the project. ("Carrie Asai" is a collective pseudonym, similar to "Carolyn Keene" of the "Nancy Drew" series.)



It follows that there will be stereotypes and inaccuracies galore.

Naturally, the miniseries amplifies these... problems.



I know I’ve said this before, but it’s worth asking again: why must every other Asian-related Hollywood project involve secret samurais and ninjas and yakuza clans? Not that there’s anything wrong with a good samurai/ninja/yakuza story… but this ain’t it.

...

But when your show is called Samurai Girl, you eventually want to see your hero become said Samurai Girl. So Heaven must learn the secret, ancient ways of the samurai, training under the wise tutelage of her sensei… a white dude. Huh? Oh, I see. Like, um, The Last Samurai.

It’s worth noting in the book series, this sensei character is actually a Japanese guy, Hiro Uyemoto, described on the book website as “Heaven’s crush-worthy samurai mentor.” I was told by someone who read an early draft of the pilot script that this character was indeed an Asian guy. Looks like that minor detail got changed somewhere along the way… Funny how that happens. [me stepping in for a moment:I suppose the calculation was that white people are unable to relate to stories that have two Asian leads. Funny how everyone else can empathize with two white leads. Or more, I mean, Star Wars? Lord of the Rings?]

Heaven also conveniently picks up some nice white, American friends to round out her crew. Yay! So let’s see. Good conveniently Caucasian friends, white samurai sensei… Bad mob boss dad, evil yakuza henchmen, douchebag Japanese fiance left at the altar. Hmmm.



And this, ladies and gents, along with the stupider and stupider plots, is why I have almost stopped watching television and movies.
unusualmusic_lj_archive: (Default)
[livejournal.com profile] delux_vivens reminded me of these.


White People Can't Understand Police Corruption

Just because you don't see a cop say n*gger doesn't mean they haven't done anything wrong. It's just privilege sure as hell showing because whites can afford to think of the police as their friends and the system as being for them- or at least they could if they weren't involved in protesting the war and getting beat the crap down in St. Paul for the RNC. And even that's not the same, the police there need to come up with some kind of excuse (however flimsy) to buss those asses. To bust a black ass?

1 - Driving while black.

2 - Driving in a 'too expensive car' while black (expensive being relative to the officer in question and his, sometimes her, perception).

3 - Walking while black.

4 - Standing on a street corner with age peers, while black (from ages 13 and up).

5 - Being black and requesting rights and equality.

6 - Being black and a sex worker.

7 - Being black and female and dressed up for clubbing.

8 - Being black and running away from gunshots.MORE



I'm thinking that based on the comments in the LJ threads that are being referred to? The "can't" in the headline should be changed to "refuse".

McCain's VP Pick : Palin and the Politica and Privilege of White Woman'hood/ Mommy'Hood


Sarah Palin wants to put herself out there as "every woman". She wants to be seen as “just your average hockey mom”, and other mommies see themselves and their reality reflected through Palin, except, mamis of color, that is.
The talk returns to mommy wars, not mami wars, because the entire conversation excludes Latinas and other moms of color. We are not even soldiers. Even for so called progressive white feminist, the war is fought by them and maybe, if mamis like me are lucky, we'll reap some benefit. When I was a pregnant teenager, in a Latin American country where abortion was and still is illegal(Chile), there was no opting out of pregnancy or working. Which is why the debate of how Palin could go back to work after having a baby with special needs or how a pregnant unmarried teenage daughter is being used, feels like a sideshow with little significance in reality. The politics of choice is being raised, with the emergence of a woman who is anti-choice, even in cases of rape or incest and with no talk of how for women of color, choice goes beyond an abortion and means the very right to have children (forget 5!) Imaginate if Michelle Obama had five children? Imaginate if one of the Obama children were older and pregnant? Imagine the hate and stereotypes that would be unleashed? Oh wait, I don't have to imagine, as a single mami of color, I live it. Palin's large brood isn't seen as a strain on the system. They are a beautiful portrait of an "American" family making every other family, families like mine, ugly.

And let's talk about the perceived double standard, that if a man had five children no one would be making a big deal of it, that men are held to a different standard, as stated in the video above. Claro if you take race out of the picture, it's easy to follow along, pero if Obama was the father to five instead of two children, you don't think the media and politicos would be making all sorts of references to black men and their hyper-sexuality? Or black men and responsibility? I hear no one telling Palin's husband to put on a damn condom. MORE

unusualmusic_lj_archive: (Default)
IS China Really worse than other OLympic Hosts?

I can totally agree that China has an awful human rights records; that what is happening in Tibet is horrible; that Beijing (and many other parts of China) are staggeringly polluted.
But here’s the thing: what Olympic host country hasn’t done terrible things that they should be held to account for? Hell, it’s often the chance to host the Olympics that motivates state violence. So why is China the only one getting called out?
Seriously, I’m not just crying wolf. In December ‘07, European organisation the Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions released the report “Fair Play for Housing Rights: Mega-Events, Olympic Games and Housing Rights.”


...


An ‘07 article in the Guardian discusses the report in more detail, stating that
In every city it examined, the Olympic games - accidentally or deliberately - have become a catalyst for mass evictions and impoverishment…The games have become a licence for land grabs…
Barcelona’s Olympics, in 1992…[were] used to cleanse the city. Roma communities were evicted and dispersed. The council produced a plan to “clean the streets of beggars, prostitutes, street sellers and swindlers” and “annoying passers-by”. Some 400 poor and homeless people were subjected to “control and supervision”.

We hear the same story in the US.

Even before the 1996 Olympics, Atlanta was one of the most segregated cities in the US. But the games gave the clique of white developers who ran them the excuse to engineer a new ethnic cleansing programme. Without any democratic process they demolished large housing projects (whose inhabitants were mostly African-American) and replaced them with shiny middle-class homes; about 30,000 families were evicted. They issued “quality of life ordinances”, which criminalised people who begged or slept rough. The police were given pre-printed arrest citations bearing the words “African-American, Male, Homeless”…In the year before the games they arrested 9,000 homeless people.
More


Funny how we ignore things based on which country does them, don't you think?
unusualmusic_lj_archive: (Default)



Apparently, there were two versions of the ad. The one of the left ran in Essence Magazine which is targeted to black women. The other ran in an *ahem* mainstream mag. (Elle) Awesome. L'Oreal, of course, has been caught in BS before.

Young, Black and Fabulous broke these pics


[livejournal.com profile] dot_race_snark  linked me in.


EDIT: New post on Racialicious saying that the fuckup might have been innocent.


Also, is it just me, or is her hair texture somewhat ...different?





EDIt: And where the hell are her laughlines?
unusualmusic_lj_archive: (Default)
Trans-Racialization in “21″

by guest contributor Jenn Fang, originally published at Reappropriate

Six MIT students band together to hoodwink Las Vegas casinos for millions.

It sounds like the plot of a Hollywood movie — and it is. But before Jim Sturgess (Across the Universe), Kate Bosworth, Kevin Spacey and Laurence Fishbourne were cast in 21, Ben Mezrich wrote a non-fiction book called Bringing Down the House, upon which the film is based. In that book, Mezrich documents the infamous MIT Blackjack team, which was led by Asian American — not White — students.

Although referred to by pseudonyms in the book, it was later revealed that the main characters of Bringing Down the House – Kevin Lewis and Jason Fisher — are former real-life MIT students Jeff Ma and Mike Aponte who are both Asian American men. Jeff Ma has since gone on to start a company based on fantasy sports, while Mike Aponte remains a professional Blackjack player.

Mezrich has criticized the casting of 21, and argued that it plays into fears of the marketability of an all-Asian cast.

During the talk, Mezrich mentioned the stereotypical Hollywood casting process — though most of the actual blackjack team was composed of Asian males, a studio executive involved in the casting process said that most of the film’s actors would be white, with perhaps an Asian female. Even as Asian actors are entering more mainstream films, such as “Better Luck Tomorrow” and the upcoming “Memoirs of a Geisha,” these stereotypes still exist, Mezrich said.

Mezrich notes that the Asian American identities of these students was critical to the MIT Blackjack team’s strategy. According to Wikipedia:

In the book, Mezrich explicitly states that a young Caucasian betting large amounts of money stands out, while a young Asian or other minority would be less conspicuous.

Perhaps in response to criticisms that 21 was “White-washing” the story, the filmmaker also cast Asian American actors Lisa Lapira and Aaron Yoo in the movie, but they remain secondary characters, distantly-removed from the story of the White male and female protagonists. The casting of Sturgess and Bosworth remains a damning assertion that Asian American faces are simply not “American”-enough to carry a big-budget film like 21. And though the story of the MIT Blackjack team centres on the Asian American identity of the team members, the movie loses its opportunity to explore this reappropriation of stereotypes by real-life Asian American men who used society’s perception of them — for better or for worse — to steal millions from Las Vegas casinos. Instead of exploring this interesting (and arguably empowering) story of racial identity, the movie becomes yet-another “boy-meets-girl” trifle with Asian American characters existing only as props to further a story about White protagonists.
Rest here
unusualmusic_lj_archive: (Default)

Debunking myths about statutory rape, race and class: Part 1 of 3

by Racialicious special correspondent Latoya Peterson

The image above has been making the rounds of the feminist blogs, most notably Feministe and Feministing.
The ad was intended to target perpetrators of statutory rape in Milwaukee. Comissioned by the United Way of Milwaukee, the PSA style posters attempted to address a growing issue in that region: an increase in teen pregnancy where the mothers were young to mid teen and the fathers were grown men.
While the images were apparently tested with a focus group, the ads were killed before they made it to the streets. Personally, I hate the images in the ad as they are so comically disorted the messages is lost. The young girls who these men are impregnating do not have seven year old faces on twenty year old bodies. Most of them do look close to their actual ages. And most of the men who would sleep with a developed fifteen year old would probably be repulsed by the idea of having sex with a seven year old.
The ad does garner attention, but by using a photoshopped image of a girl, as opposed to an actual teenager it fails to reinforce the actual message.
However, the ad itself isn’t what prompted me to write this post. The responses to the ad on mainstream feminist blogs did. As I scrolled through the comments in each thread, I was shocked to see how many women were willing to dismiss statutory rape as an issue of mistaken identity. While there were definately some commenters who spoke up as to why the ads were needed, I was astounded to see how many feminists defended the poor men in this situation, who were tricked by these age-bending teens into having sex. The prevailing assumption was that these girls were somewhere they had no business being, doing grown adult things and most of this statutory rape stuff was just an innocent mistake. Some women even threw in their own accounts of looking tragically underage and having to deal with being endlessly carded or having men leave them alone because they looked so young. Tough life.

So, I write this post in hopes that some of those women - and a few men - who were so quick to dismiss my day to day reality (and that of my friends) as a simple case of teenage sluts gone wild will read this and reconsider what they know about statutory rape, how it plays out in communties, and how it isn’t easily dismissed as a race or class issue - though both race and class do complicate things quite a bit.
Some notes before we begin:
1. In the vein of feminist blogs, I am slapping this post with a trigger warning. I am not going to describe things graphically, but some of what happens will probably be hard for some people to take. For that, I apologize, but it has to be said.
2. Please do not judge any of the actions taken by my peers or myself. All these things happened from the ages of 12 - 15. One of the events I will describe starts at age eleven. We were not in the mindset to make adult decisions, or even good decisions.
[FYI, age of consent in Maryland is 16, with an exception for actors with less than a four year age difference. This means that a 16 year old can have sex with someone aged 16 - 20 and it would not necessarily be statutory rape.]
3. Settle in, this is the first of a 3-part post.
Ready? Here we go…
“People who have sex with children know what they are doing is wrong.”
Feministing Commenter stinsonnick said:

Ad #1.
I think for the most part men who have sex with children know that it’s wrong, or at least understand that society views it as wrong. This isn’t going to help anything.

Ad #2.
I agree with GoGo. The text of this ad is the equivalent of saying “Oh yeah, she’s hot, but don’t hit that yet.” Awful. And it’s a complete contradiction to Ad #1 which says you shouldn’t even be viewing children sexually. I guess, as always, it’s okay to sexualize black women and girls.

From my reference point, his assessments are off.
Yes, society generally frowns on men that have sex with children and the term “pedophile” conjures up a pervy older man looking at kiddie porn trying to abduct a nine year old from the playground. However, in my personal experience, there are way too many men who know that having sex with a child may be wrong, but consider a teenager (or a pre-teen with a great body) is totally fine.
When I was younger, one of my biggest fears was older men. I could deal with the guys in my grade and older teenage boys. What I was not prepared for were the grown men who would persue me ruthlessly - either by following me up the street in their cars or on the metro. This experience was not unique to me - most of the girls I knew then or the women I know now have all had similar experiences with men who looked to be well into their twenties or thirties.

Read rest of Part One Here

Part Two

Part Three

Profile

unusualmusic_lj_archive: (Default)
unusualmusic_lj_archive

February 2020

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 26th, 2025 12:32 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios