unusualmusic_lj_archive: (Default)
[personal profile] unusualmusic_lj_archive
WHAT DA FUCK IS THIS?


And here was I complaining about the covers that showed women posing extra sexily in impractical heels. We ARE going to get around to a time when women ARE NOT SEEN AS FUCKING TROPHIES AND AWARDS FOR OBNOXIOUS MACHO MEN, correct? At SOME point in time? Also? Put DOWN the photoshop. No really. Put. it. DOWN.


via: [livejournal.com profile] cofax7


ETA: And then there the cover that features actual fucking. Right then.

Date: 2010-01-20 07:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-inkslinger.livejournal.com
But it's not the publisher's fault! They didn't tell the cover artist to depict women as objects; in fact they didn't give the cover artist any information on the book at all!

Date: 2010-01-20 07:43 pm (UTC)

Date: 2010-01-20 08:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maevele.livejournal.com
aren't there enough books that are actually smutty and where the smut is the story that need the smutty covers?

Date: 2010-01-21 02:50 am (UTC)
ext_6366: Red haired, dark skinned, lollipop girl (Imperial Negress)
From: [identity profile] the-willow.insanejournal.com (from livejournal.com)
I saw that cover sometime this week and just sighed, rolled my eyes and went 'White Men'. I just do not have the spoons to spare for this kind of 'OMG it's the New Millenium & We Are Being Left Behind. Fight Fight For The Old School Fail!'

Date: 2010-01-21 03:22 am (UTC)
ext_6382: Blue-toned picture of cow with inquisitive expression (Default)
From: [identity profile] bravecows.livejournal.com
Wow, the ones in the first link are so amazingly unsubtle.

Profile

unusualmusic_lj_archive: (Default)
unusualmusic_lj_archive

January 2010

S M T W T F S
     12
3 4 5 6 789
10 11 12 13 14 1516
17 18 19 20 21 2223
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Oct. 20th, 2017 07:52 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios